Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Responsibility for education

In Florida, a State Representative has proposed increasing parental involvement in childhood education by having public school teachers grade the parents. Of course, there are many angles in describing the problems with this proposal. A friend of mine who is a Florida-certified to teach and knows the local public schools told me that the parents should be the ones grading the teachers.

On the plus side, the proposal does address a problem that is very real in today's society. Too many parents don't have enough involvement in their children's education. The question in my mind is, will this proposal solve or worsen the problem? I believe that it is a treatment of a symptom rather than the ending of a societal disease.

In Harper Lee's To Kill A Mockingbird, young Scout does not take easily to school. Her teacher is appalled when she discovers that Scout knows not only how to read, but how to write cursive. Her father has spent so much time reading with her in the evenings, and her housekeeper copied out words for her to practice when she wanted something to do. The teacher is adamant that this is wrong.
"Now you tell your father not to teach you any more. It's best to begin reading with a fresh mind. You tell him I'll take over from here and try to undo the damage-"                                                               
"Ma'am?"                                                                 
 "Your father does not know how to teach. You can have a seat now."
This book was published in 1960 and referred to the rise of new teaching methods including the much-lampooned "New Math" in public school systems. The adjoining message, naturally, was that these methods would be compromised if all these parents kept thinking that they could do the job of teaching their children how to learn. The movement coincided with the Feminist Movement, which championed pushing mothers, against their will if necessary, to leave their child-rearing and climb the career ladder.

Combine these two together and you have, nurtured for about 50 years by the Liberal Left, the belief that it is the job of parents to work outside the home while leaving the matter of their children's education in the hands of government officials and "properly-trained" instructors. I note that one of the biggest questions I hear as a homeschooling mother is, "How do you know that you're qualified to teach your child?" Before the '60's and its various revolutions, such a question would have been downright laughable. Who is better qualified to teach a child than the people whose genetics created him or her?

Of course, as with many such reforms, we are now discovering that parental involvement does in fact have a strongly positive effect on a child's education. What is the solution? Although Representative Stargel is listed as a Republican, she offers the very liberal proposal that the Government, having discouraged parents from involvement, must now mandate parental involvement for the exact same reason... the good of the children. This is worse than the purported ambulance-in-the-valley solution for the lack of fence on the dangerous cliff. This is tantamount to removing an already-present fence on the cliff before instituting the ambulance in the valley.

5 comments:

  1. A few comments -
    One - there are most certainly people in this country, and I fear that the number is growing, not shrinking - that have no business teaching a child anything.

    Some of them, are teachers.
    A whole bunch of them are 'parents'

    Do I think the Government should take over? No. Not sure what you do about that particular problem, honestly. Save that you let the law of the jungle take over.

    Two - Education should begin at home, but far too many parents don't make the time to be aware of their kids day, much less teach them responsibly. Its a sad thing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you about the problem, Jon. Where the government and I disagree is the cause and the solution.

    Literacy was near 100% in Puritan New England because the parents believed fervently that the most important thing was for their children to be able to read the Bible for themselves.

    I honestly don't believe that the average human being is stupider or less capable than those Puritans, regardless of race or nationality. I do believe that our culture has become one that, well...

    I can't say they 'disapprove' of parenting exactly, they just see it as nice and worthy, but unattainable and unreasonable for most. We've got two generations now who were taught from their youth that the average parent can't teach and shouldn't try.

    I do believe that the vast majority of human beings are intelligent enough and capable enough of teaching their own children, if only they would believe in their ability and take the time with their little ones. (The children of homeschooling parents without college experience score slightly higher than the children of degreed parents.)

    I also believe that the vast majority of human beings feel the biological urge to raise the children that they bear. To push most women back to full-time work after the birth of their first is an excruciating process against which they will try to fight at least once.

    The problem with modern culture is that people are being forced to act against their instincts, and education isn't the only way that this is being done. The result? People who detach from their children and spouses and then end up depressed at an incredible rate.

    When 2% of your population suffers from a diagnosable mental disorder, there is something wrong with that part of the population. When 26% of your population suffers from a diagnosable mental disorder, there is something wrong with your society.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Amen -

    Why should parents teach their children when they've been told that's not their job and they can take the easy way out and let someone else do it for them. If the children are tought something the parents don't agree with they can always bitch about it afterwards.

    Teachers have been told that's their job to mold the little minds into thinking in certain ways, and they can't do that if parents keep contradicting them.

    Yes they're good teachers and bad parents.
    Josh

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lets try this again... Sigh.


    Oops-

    "Yes they're good teachers and bad parents." should of been written as, "Yes they're good and bad teachers and parents."

    Our system of education seems to be set up rewarding bad behavior.

    Josh

    ReplyDelete